CEO Appointment & Evaluation
|Policy Name:||CEO Appointment & Evaluation|
Board of Trustees
Location where Existing Policy can be Viewed:
Complete Wording of New or Revised Policy:
The Chancellor/President is appointed by the Board of Trustees and is the Chief Executive Officer of the University.
The Executive Committee shall formally evaluate the Chancellor/President annually. The results of the evaluation shall be attached to the official minutes of the Executive Committee. A report on the formal evaluation shall be provided by the Chair of the Executive Committee. The Chair shall, after discussion of the evaluation, bring a motion to accept the evaluation. The evaluation shall be according to the following procedures:
The Chairman of the Executive Committee shall provide summary comments concerning the evaluation in his report to the full Board at the Annual Meeting and, following discussion, shall request a motion to accept the report, including a summary of the evaluation.
This standard assumes that the governing board is that group which holds the institution and its well being in trust. This group also has responsibility for selecting and evaluating the chief executive officer. Few trustee activities are as consequential to the institution’s future and well being as finding and selecting the best possible chief executive officer, and few activities provide a better opportunity for assessing the institution’s present condition and future needs.
3.2.1 Chief Executive Officer
The governing board of the institution is responsible for the selection and the periodic evaluation of the chief executive officer.
Other Regulatory Criteria:
Definition of Glossary Terms:
PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW
Board of Trustees
Policy Review Cycle:
The Commission expects that a reasonable periodic evaluation would be at least every three years.
Other Policy Link Locations: